This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: New article that is long enough. The hook is interesting and thankfully nothing happened to it while it was operative. Neutral and interesting. QPQ unneeded. I AGF in the Turkish sources and the Google Translation I did. (CC)Tbhotch™ 03:05, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi @Styyx:, @Bazza 7:, @Sca: - thanks for your comments on the DYK talk page relating to this article. I had a look at the links suggested, but found another one which I think is more appropriate - MOS:UNIT. I've changed the article to use "metre" based on my reading of that. Also, the reference itself, although in Turkish, uses the word "metre". I can't decide whether the article should use British or American English in general, but I can't find any other text in the article which would change anyway. Cheers, Kiwipete (talk) 21:55, 15 January 2022 (UTC).